(Note: The following is
a report on a study of CSCO by the Center for Religion and Civic Culture,
University of Southern California, 1999)
Christians Supporting Community Organizing:
A New Voice for Change among Evangelical, Holiness and
Pentecostal Christians
Introduction Christians Supporting
Community Organizing
History of CSCO
Current Status
Theology
Workshops
Conclusion
Appendix
Introduction
"The individual must be made intensely aware of the importance to
his self-interests of his citizenship rights and responsibilities so that he
will be moved to action." Saul D. Alinsky
At their best, community organizations—"people’s organizations"
in Alinsky’s terms— are the highest expressions of democratic principles and
are vehicles for profound social change. They involve a broad base of people
representing many ethnic groups, religions, ages, careers, and income levels
while they energize citizens and reconnect them with the political process.
Community organizations contribute to civic life by fostering relationships
between people from diverse backgrounds, enabling them to work together to
address a myriad of issues that affect their neighborhoods and their cities,
including education, affordable housing, fair banking practices, crime
prevention, and more.
Community organizing is a method to inspire citizens to act. It is a form of
action that addresses many negative cultural, social, and economic trends in the
United States, including widespread despair about the democratic process,
rampant "me first" individualism, and a culture of consumerism.
Community organizations evolve differently as local people make decisions about
the direction and goals of their cities. Fundamentally, community organizing
addresses the issue of power. "Power," says Mike Miller, the executive
director of the ORGANIZE Training Center, "is the ability to act
effectively in the world." Many individuals and congregations feel impotent
in addressing problems of crime, affordable housing, lack of health care,
unemployment and under-employment, poor schools, and related concerns. They may
also feel inadequately represented in the political system and increasingly
alienated from our major institutions. Community organizing enables them to
develop powerful broad-based groups that act to hold government and corporate
structures accountable. Once these organizations are established, the collective
action of empowered citizens is a force to be recognized.
Modern community organizing originated in the late 1930s in Chicago. Saul
Alinsky, founder of the Industrial Areas Foundation, worked to organize the poor
and the workers in the Back of the Yards, an area made famous by Upton Sinclair’s
The Jungle. Alinsky succeeded in coalescing the ethnic parishes of the
Catholic church community, organized labor, voluntary associations, and
neighborhood residents into a single organization called the Back of the Yards
Neighborhood Council. The process of organizing these disparate groups into a
unified force became the basis for modern community organizing and, over time,
churches, synagogues, and other religious institutions became focal points for
community organizers and their national and regional networks. As the labor
movement’s interest in a broad social and economic justice agenda waned,
Alinsky’s focus shifted to the religious community.
For decades, segments of the Catholic Church and mainline Protestant churches
have been involved in community organizing and in fact, many churches with these
faith perspectives have helped to develop and disseminate the ideas of community
organizing. Some denominations, such as the Evangelical Lutheran Church in
America, have highly developed curricula on social justice that include
strategies for organizing communities. In addition, independent publications
such as the National Catholic Reporter, The Other Side, and Sojourners
highlight the role of churches in community organizations across the country.
In the past sixty years, theologically "conservative" Christians
have not participated in community organizing to a significant degree, with the
exception of some African American churches. The Evangelical, Pentecostal, and
Holiness traditions represent the fastest growing churches in American
Christendom, but they are conspicuously absent from this social movement. One of
the primary reasons is that the theologically conservative elements of the
church have focused their attention on individual salvation and personal faith,
and have not emphasized the need for social action of this kind. Another factor
has been the view that political involvement and the use of power are worldly
concerns and are therefore inevitably corrupting influences with no redeeming
virtues.
Christians Supporting Community Organizing
Christians Supporting Community Organizing (CSCO) is a bold national attempt
to change the relationship between the theologically conservative elements of
the Protestant church and community organizing. In the past, major community
organizing networks have not been successful in recruiting and engaging these
Christians and little has been done to alter this fact. CSCO represents a
historically unique attempt to challenge decades of thought, theology, and
action that have predisposed Evangelicals, Pentecostals, Holiness, and other
theologically conservative Christians to avoid political engagement, except on a
narrow range of issues related to personal behavior (e.g. abortion, promiscuous
sex, divorce, school prayer, etc.). Success for CSCO would entail a dramatic
shift in the opinions, perceptions, and actions of their target group.
Unlike many community organizers, CSCO members understand the language,
traditions, and viewpoints of the theologically conservative parts of the church
because they are from these faith perspectives. CSCO’s purpose is to get these
churches to become part of the community organizing movement. CSCO seeks to
accomplish its purpose through local members who are organized in branches that
encompass metropolitan areas. Branch members conduct individual meetings,
workshops, and other educational activities aimed at pastors and lay leaders of
their faith perspectives. Rather than creating its own network of community
organizations, CSCO works to establish a base of relationships through which it
promotes the ideas of congregation-based community organizing and encourages its
churches to join existing congregation-based community organizations that are
already in place in their communities. This is a unique effort because the
individuals who participate in CSCO become the "evangelists" to their
churches, denominations, ministerial alliances, and peers.
"Congregation-based community organizing," according to CSCO’s
proclamation, "is a process that enlists churches in faith and value-based
action to address the economic, social, and cultural conditions which
individuals and families alone lack the power to change." According to
Marilyn Stranske, national organizer and one of CSCO’s founders,
"organizing is not getting people into partisan politics." Instead,
organizing is a process of bringing issues of public life, such as politics and
economics, "under the lordship of Christ" and then helping people to
reflect and act in ways that are congruent with their faith. CSCO’s task is to
convince Evangelical, Pentecostal, and Holiness churches that congregation-based
community organizing has a biblical basis, that it is within their historical
traditions, and finally, that it is a valuable use of limited time and
resources.
According to CSCO, many of the theologically conservative churches have not
participated in, or taken stands on, issues of social concern during most of the
twentieth century. During the 1920s, many of these churches assumed a posture of
withdrawal from justice issues. They increasingly adopted cultural norms of
consumerism and individualism. One of the primary reasons for the lack of
involvement in social justice in the twentieth century, according to CSCO’s
principal theologian Robert Linthicum, is "a belief that the job of the
church is to save souls and to save individuals, and little else." Some
Evangelicals compare social action to "rearranging deck chairs on the
Titanic when it is going down," Linthicum adds. Others perform acts of
social service and have become engaged in church-based community development,
but works of justice that involve challenge existing economic and political
structures have fallen into disrepute or are ignored.
The end result has been a dichotomy between providing relief services and
addressing the underlying systemic causes of social problems. Social service
ministries—soup kitchens, homeless shelters, and the like—are common to
these elements of the church. Such services are consistent with the church’s
call to minister to individuals, especially those with unmet basic needs.
Challenging the systemic evil that causes social ills, however, is not viewed as
within the mission to "make disciples of all nations."
Despite present trends, social reform and collective action are not new
concepts within the history of these traditions. One of CSCO’s goals is to
reconnect the churches with their histories of civic participation and social
reform. In the nineteenth century, there are many examples of the extraordinary
role played by Evangelicals in social movements. Charles G. Finney, the renowned
evangelist who sparked the Second Great Awakening in the eastern United States,
was also an outspoken proponent of the abolitionist movement. In fact, he was
one of the central leaders at Oberlin College when it became one of the northern
stops for the Underground Railroad. Evangelicals and other Christians were also
widely active in the women’s suffrage movement, the creation of orphanages,
labor rights for children and adults, and other important efforts to transform
society.
Pentecostals also have a history of what Mike Miller, head of CSCO’s
California Project for Evangelicals and Pentecostals, calls
"counter-cultural" activities. In 1906, the Azusa Street revival in
Los Angeles sparked a worldwide Pentecostal movement that changed the course of
Christian history and is still burgeoning in the United States, Latin America,
and other parts of the world. The multiethnic congregation on Azusa Street was
under the leadership of the Rev. William Seymour, an African American pastor. At
a recent CSCO workshop, Murray Dempster, dean of "conservative"
Vanguard University, an Assemblies of God institution, summed up this history by
saying, "revivalism is at the heart of social transformation."
Return to About Us
Return to Homepage
History of CSCO
CSCO is built and organized around the development of relationships. In fact,
CSCO’s originators developed their strategy for influencing these elements of
the church as they developed relationships among themselves and worked on common
interests. In 1990, Marilyn Stranske attended a workshop on community organizing
led by Mike Miller and co-sponsored by World Vision International’s Office of
Urban Advance —then co-directed by Dr. Robert Linthicum—and the Bresee
Institute. There, Stranske had what she calls another "conversion
experience." She realized that her theology and worldview had lacked an
adequate understanding of institutions and the use and abuse of power. She began
to consider how congregation-based community organizing might address these
lacks, not only within herself, but also within the parts of the church in which
she had spent her life. Stranske had a long history of inner city church and
parachurch work; several experiences in this work created confusion and pain.
She doubted whether the work that she was doing was actually empowering the
poor. After the workshop, she began a period of directed study with Miller,
pursued an internship in congregation-based organizing in Denver, and traveled
to Asia with Linthicum as part of a delegation examining World Vision-supported
congregation-based community organizing. Through this process Ms. Stranske
discerned that she had a "call" to connect Evangelical, Holiness, and
Pentecostal churches to community organizing.
A respected leader in the Evangelical church, Stranske recruited several
people to become the initiators of a feasibility study to determine if leaders
within her tradition might become interested in congregation-based community
organizing as a faithful form of ministry. The initiating group gave her the
initial entrée to many other denominational leaders. The group included Dr.
Vernon Grounds, chancellor and president emeritus of Denver Theological
Seminary; Dr. Robert Linthicum, then co-director of the World Vision
International’s Office of Urban Advance, and now the director of Partners in
Urban Transformation; Rev. Kenneth Luscombe, then co-director of the Office of
Urban Advance for World Vision International; and Dr. Alice Mathews, the
producer of the Radio Bible Class and then dean of the Seminary of the East,
Philadelphia Campus. Soon this study phase became known as "The No Name
Project." When sufficient interest and commitment had been determined, The
No Name Project dissolved into a new individual membership organization called
Christians Supporting Community Organizing.
Stranske developed relationships across the country with denominational
executives, pastors, and other church leaders through individual meetings. At
these meetings, she explained the reasons that compelled her to engage in the
feasibility study and explored their level of knowledge and interest in
community organizing. She also spent a large portion of the meeting listening to
their perspectives, concerns, and yearnings for their churches and
denominations. Many leaders were concerned about the growing privatization of
the faith. They expressed ambivalence about the rise of economic prosperity in
their congregations and the resulting growth in consumerism and "watch out
for number one" individualism. Others were worried about a theology that
spiritualized some aspects of life and ignored social evils, both individual and
corporate. They lamented the loss of community and the growing divisiveness
among different groups in American society. These individual meetings allowed
Stranske to identify interest in congregation-based community organizing and
served as a feasibility study leading to the creation of CSCO. To date, Ms.
Stranske has conducted over 400 of these individual meetings.
As a result of the interest in community organizing, The No Name Project held
its first four-day workshop in July 1994 in Colorado. An initial group of
committed leaders developed from the workshop. There, Mike Miller conducted
sessions on congregation-based community organizing principles, strategies, and
techniques and Linthicum presented the biblical theology component. In 1995, the
second and third workshops took place in New Jersey and California. At each of
these, an additional number of leaders decided to commit themselves to the
effort. A four-day workshop was held in Atlanta in 1996. In 1997, Christians
Supporting Community Organizing was officially founded. Since the founding, the
organization has held ten half-day to four-day workshops.
Return to About Us
Return to Homepage
Current Status
CSCO’s structure is based on principles from community organizing and is
unlike many traditional nonprofits. It has a national leadership team, a small
staff, consultants, and a national membership. The organization seeks to develop
and empower local leaders rather than centralizing power in staff or in a
national board of directors. Therefore, its strategy is to develop highly
committed local bodies called branches. Members are committed to a high level of
participation and sign a covenant to engage in relational one-to-one visits with
pastors and other leaders, deepen their knowledge of organizing and its
biblicalroots, make a financial contribution to CSCO equal to one percent of their
annual income, participate in branch meetings, and otherwise build the work of
CSCO.
The national CSCO effort has progressed, but more slowly than anticipated; so
far CSCO is active in Boston, Chicago, Philadelphia, Rochester, Los Angeles, the
San Francisco Bay Area, Spokane, and San Diego. In all, there are thirty-six
members and ten endorsers across the country, ranging from lay persons to
bishops. The ten endorsers pay yearly dues and also lend their names in support
of the project, but do not make the full membership commitment. Though the
membership and endorsers are small in number, the commitment level is high and
each person is a leader in a church or denomination.
In keeping with the notion of a member driven organization, CSCO has a small
number of staff. Marilyn Stranske is the national organizer; Mike Miller is the
long-term consultant. Stranske is based in Denver and conducts individual
meetings with denominational executives, pastors, and lay leaders, and has one
part-time administrative staff person in her office. Miller is the expert on
philosophy, strategy and methods of organizing and has almost 40 years of
experience in the field. He is the executive director of ORGANIZE Training
Center in San Francisco and directs the CSCO-related California Project for
Evangelicals and Pentecostals. The rationale behind this structure is to
encourage local ownership by branch members and to minimize reliance on staff
direction. A reality of the CSCO effort is that one full time organizer with
part time support staff based in Colorado and one consultant on organizing,
however experienced, cannot undertake the massive task of spreading the CSCO
message alone. Therefore, the practical implementation of a national program
must inherently rely on local participation and ownership.
The goal is to create local metropolitan area branches of between seven and
fifteen people. The branches are responsible for recruiting and eventually
providing some of the training. Regular branch meetings are held to discuss
organizing projects, to receive theological training, and to keep the network
active. The objective of the recruiting done by branch members is to lead
churches to join existing congregation-based community organizations.
In California, CSCO’s work is done under the auspices of the California
Project with Evangelicals and Pentecostals. Currently, the Los Angeles branch is
the most developed in CSCO. It has sixteen members and is moving ahead as
envisioned in the original plan. Members are meeting with pastors and other
leaders and spreading their excitement about congregation-based community
organizing. In June 1999, the Los Angeles branch sponsored a one-day workshop
that had forty attendees representing several denominations and ethnic
components of the church. Already, pastors from Los Angeles and Orange counties
have attended meetings with organizing networks in their respective areas.
Return to About Us
Return to Homepage
Theology
One of the major contributions that CSCO brings to the Evangelical,
Pentecostal, and Holiness churches is its theological engagement. Though the
established community organizing networks have done some theological work, it
has not been comprehensive or systematic in its design and has not been built on
a firm biblical foundation. Without a solid biblical basis for organizing, the
task of integrating the CSCO-targeted churches would be impossible. Dr. Robert
Linthicum is CSCO’s primary teacher on the biblical basis for community
organizing. He has impressive credentials and has practical experience in urban
areas as a pastor, organizer, and as the co-director of the Office of Urban
Advance, World Vision International. He is currently executive director of
Partners in Urban Transformation. He holds a doctorate from San Francisco
Theological Seminary and masters degrees from McCormick Theological Seminary and
Wheaton Graduate School of Theology.
Linthicum’s theology has the unmistakable imprint of his many years of
urban experience in the United States and abroad. In his workshop presentations,
Linthicum tells the story of his own transformation regarding community
organizing and his extremely painful introduction to the realities of systemic
evil. During the late 1950s, he was a college student engaged in ministry in a
government housing project in Chicago, where the "vertical slums" were
terrifying places for children and adults alike. Linthicum was interacting with
the African American teenagers who lived in the housing projects when he met a
fourteen year old girl whom he calls Eva. Eva came to him one day, distraught.
She said that a large gang was pressuring her to become a prostitute for men
from the suburbs and she asked him for help. His response was consistent with
his experience and theology at the time. He encouraged her to resist temptation
and that if she did, that evil would flee from her.
When he returned from summer vacation, Linthicum found that Eva had become a
prostitute. She said that the gang threatened to harm her father and brother if
Eva did not succumb. First, her father was badly beaten. Next her brother was
beaten and was hospitalized. Finally, the gang threatened to rape her mother and
she knew that they were serious so she succumbed. Linthicum was deeply outraged
and asked why she had not gone to the police for help. Moments later, his view
of the world was forever altered when Eva revealed that the local police were
the "gang members" threatening her and forcing her to become a
prostitute. Stunned, Linthicum had discovered that his theology had not prepared
him for the possibility of such deeply rooted systemic evil in an institution
established to uphold justice. Individual faith was not enough to address
rampant police corruption. This experience and others launched him on the path
of discovery that eventually led him to community organizing.
One of the foundations of Linthicum’s theology is the "shalom
community." He states that every human society is built upon three basic
systems: a foundation of generally accepted values (what Linthicum calls the
"religious system"), a political system ordering that society, and an
economic system that generates and distributes goods and services. Each of the
systems is intertwined with the other. In the ideal society intended by God,
Linthicum teaches, the shalom community is built upon a religious system
committed "to serve the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your
soul, and to observe the Lord’s commands." Thus, in a shalom community
the primary task of people would be building a relational culture (that is,
loving and being committed to God and to each other). Such a relational culture,
Linthicum adds, will build a politics of justice and an economic system which
would be equitable in the distribution of wealth so that there were "no
poor among them." There would be no great disparity of wealth or income. In
a fallen society, on the other hand, an economics of greed influences and
corrupts the political system so that it acts oppressively and, finally, coopts
the religious system to help the oppressors maintain their power by
rationalizing the oppression as if it were God’s, or that society’s, highest
intent.
Linthicum believes that God’s people are called to change society if the
systems are not functioning as God intended them. He stresses that the Bible
provides communal direction for churches and nations, not merely for
individuals, and he argues that discipleship includes seeking economic justice,
confronting oppression, and restoring communities to health. This biblical
theology, presented at the workshops, is clearly revelatory for the participants
and is an important factor in their decisions to join CSCO.
Return to About Us
Return to Homepage
Workshops
"For I’m building a people of power
And I’m making a people of praise
That will move through this land by my Spirit
And will glorify my precious Name.
Build your church, Lord.
Make us strong, Lord.
Join our hearts, Lord, through your Son.
Make us one, Lord, in your body,
In the kingdom of your Son."
Workshop "theme song" introduced by Robert Linthicum as taught to
him by a community organization with which he worked in India.
In addition to meetings with individuals, workshops are the primary places
where the CSCO effort presents its challenging material and encourages
involvement. At the October 1998 workshop, Marilyn Stranske introduced the
four-day meeting by inviting each participant to "interact, think, argue,
pray," and "if you feel so led, join us." Workshops are typically
four-day sessions that provide an introduction to principles of community
organizing and offer the theological rationale for churches to participate. As
in other community organizing settings, personal histories play an important
role. Miller, Linthicum, Stranske, and other CSCO members speak passionately
about how community organizing has radically changed their lives and how it has
altered the very futures of churches and neighborhoods. Stories are important
for organizers because they connect people to each other and break down walls of
alienation that exist between people because of individualism, consumerism, and
the privatization of faith.
In many ways, the workshops represent a marriage between the cultures of
community organizing and churches. There are prayers, Bible studies, hymns,
daily sermons, and worship services. References to Jesus, God, and the Holy
Spirit are prevalent. At the same time, the men and women at the workshops are
there to ask tough questions about, to learn about, and to make decisions about
congregation-based community organizing and how it might fit into their
ministries.
Throughout the workshops, listening is one of the key concepts. Linthicum
often cites Exodus 2:23-25, a passage that describes God hearing the
"groaning" of the Hebrew people who are slaves in Egypt at the time.
The point is that God heard and responded to the people even though the text
gives no indication that their groans were directed to God. This theme of
listening for the groans is restated in numerous ways throughout the workshops
with the goal of helping pastors and other Christian leaders to identify the
needs of their congregations, neighborhoods, and peer groups.
Mike Miller, a community organizer with almost 40 years of community
organizing and civil rights work, provides most of the theoretical and practical
experiences with community organizing. In one role-playing exercise, Miller
takes on the persona of "Mr. Obstruction," a manager of a housing
project. The participants plan a meeting with Mr. Obstruction to negotiate with
him about a series of problems they are having in their building. They plan the
meeting, but Miller plays a shrewd man who usurps the meeting, stalls the
process, and frustrates the community representatives. After the exercise, he
leads the debriefing and employs the Socratic method to help people understand
the strategies employed by Mr. Obstruction. Later, he leads a session on more
effective ways to conduct meetings with decision-makers. Miller also trains the
participants in community organizing tools, such as individual meetings.
The workshops employ many types of exercises to engage the participants. One
of the most effective exercises is the use of family groups. During the first
evening session, the participants choose to join a fictional family group living
in the typical American urban/suburban population center, Laodicea. The
Washington, Brown, Chan, Diaz, and Strickland families are residents of the
metropolitan area and each family has a set of issues that concern them. The
family groups are an effective way to apply what has been learned from the
theoretical sessions. For example, after a discussion about the
"groans" of the people, the family groups discuss the issues of their
families and the metropolitan area of Laodicea. All of the other small group
activities during the workshop take place in these family groups, so that by the
end of the workshop there is a strong bond between the members and they have
learned to work well as a unit. Four-day workshops conclude with organizational
meetings to which participants are invited if they wish to explore membership in
CSCO.
In interviews with participants from the October 1998 workshop, there were
many positive responses to the CSCO presentation. Steve Smith, an Assemblies of
God pastor and professor at Vanguard University, said that in order to be
effective, urban ministry "is going to take more than spiritual ministry or
preaching." Before the workshop he knew about community development, but
the workshop helped to clarify community organizing. Smith added that he would
seek to explore the local organizing efforts with his congregation in Inglewood
and also include concepts from the workshop in his university teaching.
Other participants stated that the theological presentations gave them new
insights into the role of Christians and their responsibility to work for
change, especially when unjust systems are in operation. Andrew Kwong, a
pharmacist and chair of the Social Concern committee of the First Evangelical
Church Association, was impressed by the systematic analysis of the biblical
teaching related to justice issues. Kwong said that at the workshop, Linthicum
"adjusted our eyeglasses [so] now I see with more clarity" regarding
God’s perspective on urban issues. Several participants discussed profound
changes and new insights resulting from the teaching on theology.
Return to About Us
Return to Homepage
Conclusion
Christians Supporting Community Organizing has undertaken a monumental task.
The organization has the complex mission of explaining community organizing and
establishing a new relational network in the theologically conservative parts of
the Protestant church. Moreover, it must articulate a theology that convinces
pastors, denominational executives, and lay leaders that this particular way to
engage society has a biblical basis. Finally, it must shepherd pastors and their
churches to engage in serious exploration of membership in local
congregation-based community organizations in their areas.
One of the most promising developments for the movement is the relationship
between CSCO, the Assemblies of God, and the Church of God in Christ. Two key
leaders from these denominations have joined CSCO’s work. Bishop George
McKinney is an active board member of the Pacific Institute for Community
Organization (PICO), an organizing network that is active in many cities in
California. He is a strong advocate for community organizing and has brought his
congregation into the PICO fold. McKinney administers the Second Jurisdiction of
the Church of God in Christ, one of the largest areas of the COGIC denomination,
and is thus a very influential CSCO member. Another key leader is David Gable,
the assistant superintendent of the Assemblies of God’s Southern California
District, and a leading proponent of Christians becoming involved in the
organizing process. He actively encourages his pastors, especially urban
pastors, to participate in CSCO.
During March of 2000, the two denominations are hosting a joint workshop on
congregation-based community organizing. The workshop will gather respected
pastors and leaders from the denominations and CSCO will organize and present
the workshop. This is obviously a major opportunity to influence the
denominations. It is also a tangible step toward racial reconciliation, linking
pastors and lay leaders from the predominantly white assemblies of God with
their counterparts of the predominantly African American Church of God in
Christ.
Evangelical, Pentecostal, and Holiness churches have demonstrated their
ability to organize around private issues of faith. CSCO inspires them to
consider a broader vision of the Christian life. Christians have a call to
confront evil in its structural forms and to address issues that are beyond the
scope of individual behavior and personal change. CSCO reminds Pentecostals,
Evangelicals, and Holiness tradition denominations of their Old Testament
heritage of justice, the New Testament’s vision of the kingdom of God, and of
their nineteenth century predecessors whose work to transform their society was
based in their faith. The Center for Religion and Civic Culture considers CSCO’s
work to be an important contribution to a faithful rendering of the gospel
message.
Return to About Us
Return to Homepage
Appendix 1: Community, congregation, and broad-based organizing networks in
California
The
Gamaliel Foundation grew out of an effort to support an African
American organization on Chicago's West Side. In 1986, the foundation was
reorganized to focus on congregation-based community organizing. Today, its
network consists of staff and over 600 clergy across the country. In Oakland,
Gamaliel is active through the Oakland Coalition of Congregations. For
additional information, call the Gamaliel Foundation national office in Chicago
at (312) 357-2639.
The Industrial Areas Foundation (IAF) is the largest organizing
network engaged with congregation-based community organizing in metropolitan
areas across the country. IAF, founded by Saul Alinsky in 1940, is also the
largest and oldest of the community organizing networks. In California, IAF is
active in the following areas:
- Los Angeles Metropolitan area: Southern California Organizing Committee,
East Valleys Organization, Valley Organized in Community Efforts and United
Neighborhoods Organization.
- San Francisco and San Mateo Counties: Bay Area Organizing Committee,
- Sonoma and Napa Counties: Sonoma-Napa Action Project
- Sacramento and Solano Counties: Sacramento Valley Organizing Community/Solano
County Organizing Community
- Monterey and Santa Cruz Counties: Monterey Bay Organizing Project
For additional information call the Industrial Areas Foundation-West Coast
Vision office in San Francisco at (415) 447-0774.
The Pacific Institute for Community Organization (PICO) was founded by
two Jesuit priests in 1972. Today PICO has affiliate community organizations in
over 70 cities around the United States. PICO is active through local
organizations in the following areas:
- Sacramento: Sacramento Area Churches Together
- Stockton: People and Congregations Together
- Oakland: Oakland Community Organizations
- Hayward: South Alameda County Interfaith Sponsoring Committee
- San Francisco: San Francisco Organizing Project
- San Carlos: Peninsula Interfaith Action
- San Jose: People Acting in Community Together
- Anaheim: Orange County Congregation-Community Organization
- San Bernardino and Riverside Counties: Inland Congregations United for
Change
- San Diego: San Diego Organizing Project
- Contra Costa County: Contra Costa County Interfaith Sponsoring Committee
- Fresno: Fresno Area Congregations Together
- Long Beach: Greater Long Beach Interfaith Sponsoring Committee
For additional information call (510) 655-2801.
The Regional Council of Neighborhood Organizations (RCNO) is a
national network with organizations in 16 cities. During the past eight years ,
several thousand clergy, lay and community leaders have participated in RCNO
workshops or training sessions. In Los Angeles, RCNO works with small and medium
size African American churches through the Los Angeles Metropolitan Churches
(LAM). For additional information call (323) 846-2513.
Center for Religion and Civic Culture (CRCC)
During the period March 1997 to July 1999, the Center for Religion and Civic
Culture at the University of Southern California researched and documented the
activities of the California Project for Evangelicals and Pentecostals, in
cooperation with the ORGANIZE Training Center. The Center for Religion and Civic
Culture (CRCC) is an organized research unit of the University of Southern
California. Its mission is to research the civic role of religion and to
interpret faith-based activities to an audience that includes scholars,
religious institutions, funders, public officials, and the media. Research was
funded by a subgrant from ORGANIZE Training Center through funding from The
James Irvine Foundation. This report is a summary of our findings during the
approximately two years of research.
CRCC conducted its research by observing and documenting workshops,
interviewing participants formally and informally, and conversing with
California Project leaders. Professor Donald Miller, CRCC’s executive
director, and Orlando Love, research assistant, attended a four-day workshop
held in Santa Cruz in September 1997. Miller, Love, and Timothy Sato attended a
workshop in Los Angeles in October 1998. At each event, researchers took
detailed field notes of the content and activities they observed.
CRCC interviewed 27 participants in the California Project. These included
members, non-members, denominational executives, workshop participants, and
those in the process of determining their relationship with the effort. CRCC
also interviewed individuals who participated in the workshops and decided not
to join as members.
The ethnic and gender composition of the interviewees is summarized in the
following table:
African Am. |
Asian |
Anglo |
Latino |
Other |
Total |
M |
F |
M |
F |
M |
F |
M |
F |
M |
F |
M |
F |
4 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
13 |
0 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
22 |
5 |
18.5% |
15% |
48% |
18.5% |
0% |
81% |
19% |
This ethnic and gender balance in the interview pool is very similar to the
California Project’s statistics based on its California contact list from
November 1998.
CRCC also conducted interviews with the three central figures in the
CSCO/ORGANIZE Training Center effort, Marilyn Stranske, Mike Miller, and Bob
Linthicum. Ms. Stranske is the lead organizer of the effort and is the
Denver-based CSCO’s only full-time staff person. Mr. Miller provides training
in community organizing and is a highly experienced community organizer. He
serves as a consultant to CSCO and is the executive director of ORGANIZE
Training Center. Dr. Linthicum provides the majority of the theological training
for CSCO and is the executive director of Partners in Urban Transformation and
the author of many books on urban issues.
End of the booklet
For additional information on Christians Supporting Community Organizing and
the California Project with Evangelicals and Pentecostals, please contact:
Marilyn Stranske, National Organizer
Christians Supporting Community Organizing
P.O. Box 8766, Denver, CO 80201
(303) 860-7747 extension 134, Fax (303) 860-1914
Mike Miller, Executive Director
ORGANIZE Training Center
442-A Vicksburg, San Francisco, CA 94114
(415) 821-6180, Fax (415) 821-1631
Credits
Written by Timothy Sato and Professor Donald E. Miller
Research Team:
Donald E. Miller, Executive Director
Orlando Love, Research Assistant
Timothy Sato, Program Coordinator
Design: Margi Denton, Denton Design Associates
|