The Activist Who Takes Sin
Seriously
by Stephen Mott
A conviction of the existence of
evil in the social system can lead to one of two responses according
to a typology worked out by Max Weber. Weber called both patterns
"asceticism." Asceticism is a mode of religious response
in the face of a larger society given over with little restraint to
self-seeking. The goal of ascetics is to achieve mastery over fallen
nature. To achieve this control, they structure the whole of life in
an effort to be conformed to the will of God. Asceticism produces a
systematic, methodical character and an avoidance of what is
purposeless and ostentatious.
Weber identified two very
different forms of asceticism. One he called "other-worldly
asceticism," the other "inner-worldly asceticism." Of
the two, inner-world asceticism was the most likely to provide
leverage for evolutionary social change. Inner-worldly ascetics,
best represented in certain types of Puritanism, apply their concern
about sin and spiritual discipline to a mastery of life around
themselves, rather than to defeating sin within. Other-worldly
ascetics flee the world. Inner-worldly ascetics face the world,
extending the quest for the mastery of evil to all aspects of the
human condition.
Because inner-worldly ascetics
reject the existing world-order, the world is their place of
mission. The theocentric viewpoint on which their criticism of the
world is based is also the source of a calling to glorify God in the
world. The energies committed to the struggle with evil within are
channeled into vigorous support of this outward mission. For the
Calvinist, for example, in addition to a specific calling in daily
work, there was also a general vocation in the world to work for the
establishment of a society of justice and mercy. Calvinism
everywhere formed voluntary associations for deeds of neighborly
love and was engaged in a systematic endeavor to mold society as a
whole.
Evangelical Christianity has borne
several marks of the inner-worldly ascetic pattern. Although in the
twentieth century the drive for social righteousness has frequently
been lacking, the unmatched commitment to worldwide missions is a
form of activism expressing that religious energy and discipline in
financial sacrifice, physical suffering, vocational choice, and
prayer. The plethora of supportive organizations is also
characteristic. Even separatist patterns in church polity and
personal ethics can be seen in part as a methodical discipline to
support the mission. Accordingly, zealous activity has been directed
not to saving one’s own soul but to setting one’s redeemed soul
to save the world. In ancient Israel one also sees a separated
people with a mission to the nations. In the bible, the notion of
the separation of a people from the world is but the corollary of
the revelation of the Lord to a people who will become the bearer of
the living truth and a missionary to all humanity.
Biblically informed concern about
sin thus provides a piety capable of energizing effective social
action. Vigorous and systematic social involvement requires not that
Christians weaken the structure of their piety but rather that they
carry it through to its natural social consequences.
Finally, there is a danger that an
awareness of evil may lead to nothing more than dogmatic
condemnation of the surrounding society. But social evil also means
the fear, the humiliation, the suffering, and the loss when people
hurt people. God knows that hurt and cries out against it. We do not
know what sin is until we weep with the weeping of the earth. We are
in touch with the substance of justice when the hunger of
righteousness within us is one with our anguish at human suffering.
Then we know more fully what it means that Christ was "made
sin" for us.
Stephen Mott, Biblical Ethics & Social
Change, New York: Oxford University Press, 1982, pp. 19-21.
|